The close is clean.
The reasoning sits in three inboxes.
A difference is left standing at reconciliation. It gets resolved, usually correctly. What is missing is the path from the consolidated number back to the decision that explains it — and to the person who made it.
Which number in the reporting can I trace back to its source and to the decision?
Reconciliation
Differences are kept in spreadsheets and resolved by email. The transaction ends when the number fits.
Ownership
Who owns an exception is rarely on the transaction — it is in the head of the person who worked it.
Consolidation
The group number carries the result, not its reasoning. When someone asks, the search begins.
The close is rarely the problem. Traceability is.
From the transaction to the decision.
Four steps, and the same cross-functional capabilities across every one of them.
- Cases
- Controls
- Authorities
- Evidence
What comes together.
Every module is a standalone entry point. This chain shows what comes together once several of them run on the same finance data model.
Accounting & Close R2R
In active development
Runs reconciliation, accruals and task control, and turns every open position into a named exception rather than a residual line.
Cases & Exceptions Case management
In active development
Gives the exception an owner, a date and a basis. What is unresolved is visibly open, not quietly done.
Control & authority Cross-functional
Verified in product
Checks at the moment of the decision who may decide — per entity, amount and transaction type. Where there is doubt, a case is created.
Evidence Cross-functional
Verified in product
Keeps origin, basis, decision and outcome retrievable together — on the transaction, not in a folder beside it.
Group Finance Consolidation
In active development
Carries the entity number into the group view and keeps the path back to transaction and decision.
The chain of financial effects.
Who decides, and what stays of it.
Correct, accrue, escalate or carry as an open position. Each of those decisions stays retrievable on the transaction with person, authority, basis and time.
The boundary we do not move.
ERP and accounting
The posting stays in the posting system. FinanceOS takes on the reconciliation and the exceptions in between.
Document source
The document stays in its own store; the case refers to it rather than keeping a copy.
Retention
Retention and procedural questions are yours to settle with your auditor; we claim no certification on them.
What we can evidence here — and what we cannot.
What is not marked, we do not claim. The full state per capability is on the module pages and under what we can evidence today.
Three questions from the first conversation.
Is the audit trail immutable?
The audit trail is tenant-scoped and append-only in operation. We do not claim immutability today — that is an open requirement in our own delivery, and we mark it as one instead of promising it.
Does this replace our close checklist?
It turns it into a transaction. Task, exception, owner and decision hang on the same object as the number that results from them.
How deep does the trace go?
To the transaction FinanceOS ran, and to the document it refers to. What happened inside the posting system stays traceable there — we document the connection, not the posting.
Thirty minutes on one of your own close differences.
Bring this case as it looks in your organisation. We work through it on your example and say where a common finance layer holds and where it does not.